<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Who are Americans? &#187; USA</title>
	<atom:link href="http://whoareamericans.com/category/usa/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://whoareamericans.com</link>
	<description>A global view of America and Americans ... with a special look at good things Americans are doing in Africa, Asia, South America, Europe and around the world.</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 14:54:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Upwardly Global helps professional immigrants find employment</title>
		<link>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/09/24/upwardly-global/</link>
		<comments>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/09/24/upwardly-global/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoareamericans.com/?p=500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Upwardly Global (UG) is an American nonprofit organization that helps highly qualified immigrants find employment in the USA. UG has helped professional job seekers from more than 94 countries through relationships with more than 70 employers. Job seekers must be permanent residents of the U.S. and be work-authorized.
UG&#8217;s job search program for professional immigrants is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Upwardly Global" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.upwardlyglobal.org">Upwardly Global</a> (UG) is an American nonprofit organization that <strong>helps highly qualified immigrants find employment in the USA</strong>. UG has helped professional job seekers from more than <strong>94 countries </strong>through relationships with more than 70 employers. Job seekers must be permanent residents of the U.S. and be work-authorized.</p>
<p>UG&#8217;s job search program for professional immigrants is <strong>currently open only to those presently living in the San Francisco Bay area, New York City Metro area and the Chicago Metro areas.</strong></p>
<p>All UG job candidates have a Bachelor degree (or higher) from an accredited university, and have worked in professional environments for at least three years.<span id="more-500"></span></p>
<p>Free services of UG include:<br />
* Assistance with resume and cover letter writing.<br />
* American job search skills workshops.<br />
* Instruction in targeted internet job searching.<br />
* Job leads for professional positions in San Francisco, New York and Chicago.</p>
<p>UG&#8217;s services help professional immigrants overcome job search obstacles such as lack of personal connections in the industry, difficulty in writing a US-style resume, difficulty in understanding what to say in job interviews, and employer misconceptions about foreign-born job candidates.</p>
<p>Upwardly Global currently has a 180 Degrees of Change Campaign to raise $180,000 in 180 days. UG hopes to provide employment services to 700 refugees, asylees and legal immigrants in 2008.</p>
<p>Information on donating, volunteering, or participating as a job seeker or employer can be found on their website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/09/24/upwardly-global/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How are video games impacting American teenagers?</title>
		<link>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/09/19/american-video-gamers/</link>
		<comments>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/09/19/american-video-gamers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Sep 2008 12:31:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoareamericans.com/?p=491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A September 16, 2008 report by Pew Internet &#38; American Life Project reports that 97% of American teenagers (ages 12 to 17) play computer, web, portable, or console games &#8230; 31% play ever every day.
26% of teenage gamers played 2 hours or more per day (when asked how many hours they played yesterday). 34% of boys [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A September 16, 2008 report by Pew Internet &amp; American Life Project reports that 97% of American teenagers (ages 12 to 17) play computer, web, portable, or console games &#8230; 31% play ever every day.</p>
<p>26% of teenage gamers played 2 hours or more per day (when asked how many hours they played yesterday). 34% of boys and 17% of girls played 2 hours or more per day.</p>
<p>On any given day, 50% of teen gamers report playing video games.</p>
<p>62% of parents say that video games have no effect on their children one way or the other.<br />
19% of parents say that video games have a positive influence on their children.<br />
13% of parents say that video games have a negative influence on their children.<span id="more-491"></span></p>
<p><strong>Is this gaming experience good or bad for America&#8217;s youth?</strong> This study admittedly doesn&#8217;t take into account the effects of gaming on physical health, exercise, and other concerns, but gives some interesting insights.</p>
<p>Some of the findings of the research study indicate:</p>
<p>* Race, ethnicity and family income do not make a difference in the length of time teens spend gaming.</p>
<p>* The quantity of game play is not strongly related to teens&#8217; interest or engagement in civic and political activity.</p>
<p>* But the characteristics of game play and the contexts in which teens play games are strongly related to teens&#8217; interest and engagement in civic and political activities.</p>
<p>* Teens who take part in social interaction related to the game, such as commenting on websites or contributing to discussion boards, are more engaged civically and politically.</p>
<p>* The most active, frequent gamers are just as communicative and socially engaged as less-active gamers.</p>
<p>* Among teens who play games, 63% report seeing or hearing “people being mean and overly aggressive while playing,”. Of those who have had these experiences, 73% state they have seen or heard other players ask the aggressor to stop.&#8221;</p>
<p>* Teens who play games also witness a large amount of “pro-social” behaviors. More than three-fourths of teens who took the survey report witnessing “people being generous or helpful while playing.”<br />
The five most popular games among American teens are Guitar Hero, Halo 3, Madden NFL, Solitaire and Dance Dance Revolution.</p>
<p>The category of games listed in order of popularity are:<br />
1) Racing<br />
2) Puzzle<br />
3) Sports<br />
4) Action<br />
5) Adventure<br />
6) Rhythm<br />
7) Strategy<br />
8) Simulation<br />
9) Fighting<br />
10) First-Person Shooters<br />
11) Role-Playing<br />
12) Survival-Horror<br />
13) MMOGs (Massive Multiplayer Online Games)<br />
14) Virtual Worlds</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/09/19/american-video-gamers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2009 Best American College rankings</title>
		<link>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/08/28/2009-college-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/08/28/2009-college-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 11:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoareamericans.com/?p=427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Harvard is the top ranked national university in U.S. News &#38; World Report&#8217;s 2009 ranking of American colleges.
The rankings are based on surveys of college officials, graduation rates, retention rates, financial resources, student selectivity, educational resources and other factors. The top national schools in this survery are listed below:
1. Harvard
2. Princeton
3. Yale
4. Massachusetts Institute of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harvard is the top ranked national university in <a title="2009 College Rankings" rel="nofollow" href="http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college">U.S. News &amp; World Report&#8217;s 2009 ranking of American colleges</a>.</p>
<p>The rankings are based on surveys of college officials, graduation rates, retention rates, financial resources, student selectivity, educational resources and other factors. The top national schools in this survery are listed below:</p>
<p>1. Harvard<br />
2. Princeton<br />
3. Yale<span id="more-427"></span><br />
4. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT)<br />
4. Stanford<br />
6. California Institute of Technology<br />
6. University of Pennsylvania<br />
8. Columbia University<br />
8. Duke University<br />
8. University of Chicago<br />
11. Dartmouth<br />
12. Northwestern<br />
12. Washington University in St. Louis<br />
14. Cornell<br />
15. Johns Hopkins<br />
16. Brown<br />
17. Rice<br />
18. Emory<br />
18. University of Notre Dame<br />
18. Vanderbilt<br />
21. University of California-Berkeley<br />
22. Carnegie Mellon University<br />
23. Georgetown<br />
23. University of Virginia<br />
25. University of California - Los Angeles</p>
<p>Amherst College, Williams College, Swathmore College, Wellesley College and Middlebury College are the 5 highest ranked liberal arts colleges.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/08/28/2009-college-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Growth of minority and senior populations in USA</title>
		<link>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/08/21/minority-senior-populations/</link>
		<comments>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/08/21/minority-senior-populations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Aug 2008 13:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoareamericans.com/?p=424</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;Minorities, now roughly one-third of the U.S. population, are expected to become the majority in 2042&#8243;, says the U.S. Census Bureau in a report issued in August, 2008.
If you look at only children, more than 50% of children of the children in the USA will be minorities by the year 2023, and 62% of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Minorities, now roughly one-third of the U.S. population, are expected to become the majority in 2042&#8243;,</strong> says the U.S. Census Bureau in a report issued in August, 2008.</p>
<p>If you look at only children, more than 50% of children of the children in the USA will be minorities by the year 2023, and 62% of the nation&#8217;s children will be minorities by the year 2050.</p>
<p>By the year 2050, the single-race whites (non-Hispanic) will number 203.3 million.<br />
By the year 2050, the minority population will number 235.7 million.<span id="more-424"></span></p>
<p>The non-Hispanic, single-race white population is expected to drop from 66% in 2008 to 46% by the year 2050.</p>
<p>The Hispanic population&#8217;s share of the total U.S. population is expected to double from 15% to 30% (132.8 million) by 2050. About 1 in 3 U.S. residents would be Hispanic.</p>
<p>The black population is expected to increase to 65.7 million in 2050 (about 15% of U.S. total population).<br />
The Asian population is expected to increase to 40.6 million in 2050 (about 9% of U.S. total population).</p>
<p>The number of people over the age of 65 is expected to be 88.5 million in 2050 (currently 38.7 million).</p>
<p>The number of people over the age of 85 is expected to be 19 million in 2050 (currently 5.4 million).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/08/21/minority-senior-populations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More than 30 foreign born athletes on America&#8217;s Olympic Team</title>
		<link>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/08/08/olympic-athletes/</link>
		<comments>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/08/08/olympic-athletes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 02:31:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoareamericans.com/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At least 33 foreign-born athletes will be members of the 596-person U.S. Olympic team in the 2008 Beijing Olympic Summer Games. The U.S. Olympic Committee reports 27 foreign-born athletes competed in the 2004 Summer Olympics. Canada is reported to have over 50 foreign born athletes on its Olympic team, and countries all over the world are doing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>At least 33 foreign-born athletes will be members of the 596-person U.S. Olympic team</strong> in the 2008 Beijing Olympic Summer Games. The U.S. Olympic Committee reports 27 foreign-born athletes competed in the 2004 Summer Olympics. Canada is reported to have over 50 foreign born athletes on its Olympic team, and countries all over the world are doing the same.</p>
<p><strong>Lopez Lomong (1,500-meters track and field runner), formerly from Sudan, will carry the U.S. flag at the Opening Ceremony</strong>. Lopez was given the honor by a vote of the team captains of the entire U.S. Olympic Team.</p>
<p>Some of the foreign born athletes competing for the U.S. Olympic team include:</p>
<p>Russia - Nastia Liukin - One of the world&#8217;s top gymnasts.</p>
<p>Kenya - Bernard Lagat - 1,500 meters in men&#8217;s track.<span id="more-417"></span></p>
<p>Mexico - Leo Manzano - 1,5000 meters in men&#8217;s track.</p>
<p>Soviet Union (1992) &amp; Georgia (1996, 2000) - Khatuna Lorig - Archery.</p>
<p>Peru - Giuseppe Lanzone - Men&#8217;s rowing team.</p>
<p>United Kingdom - Heather Corrie - Women&#8217;s kayaking.</p>
<p>India - Raj Bhavsar - Men&#8217;s gymnastics.</p>
<p>China - Gao Jun, Chen Wang, Crystal Huang, David Zhuang - Table tennis.</p>
<p>Australia - Phillip Dutton - Equestrian team.</p>
<p>Laos - Bob Malaythong - Badminton.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/08/08/olympic-athletes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Education &#8230; Is America getting a passing grade?</title>
		<link>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/07/17/future-education-america/</link>
		<comments>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/07/17/future-education-america/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 19:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoareamericans.com/?p=395</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&#8220;The U.S. is the only country among 30 (OECD) free-market countries where the current generation is less well educated than the previous one&#8221;, states a June, 2008 &#8220;Reach Higher, America: Overcoming Crisis in the U.S. Workforce&#8221; report from the National Commission on Adult Literacy.
&#8220;Between 88 and 90 million adults aren&#8217;t prepared to meet the demands [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;The U.S. is the only country among 30 (OECD) free-market countries where the current generation is less well educated than the previous one&#8221;</strong>, states a June, 2008 &#8220;Reach Higher, America: Overcoming Crisis in the U.S. Workforce&#8221; report from the <a title="National Commission on Adult Literacy" rel="nofollow" href="http://www.nationalcommissiononadultliteracy.org">National Commission on Adult Literacy</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;Between 88 and 90 million adults aren&#8217;t prepared to meet the demands of today&#8217;s global economy or secure a family-sustaining wage job.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;Our nation&#8217;s 25 to 34 year-olds are the first generation in U.S. history to be less educated than their parents&#8221;.</strong></p>
<p>&#8220;America is losing its place as a world leader in education, and in fact is becoming less educated.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;About 8,000 people turn 60 every day. As these “baby boomers” leave the workforce, their places are being taken by the smaller cohort of workers born in the mid-to-late 1960s and early 1970s. As a result, the U.S. workforce is increasing more slowly and, without intervention, is likely to become less educated on average.</p>
<p>&#8220;The Commission concludes that the present situation threatens not only America’s ability to compete in the world economy, but its civic preparedness, its national security, and its very democratic core. It offers an action program to overcome crisis and throws down the gauntlet: the time to act is now!&#8221;<span id="more-395"></span></p>
<p>Some other findings of the report:</p>
<p>* &#8220;Every year, one in three young adults—more than 1.2 million people—drop out of high school. Even more alarming, many high school graduates who do complete high school lack basic skills and readiness for job training and college.&#8221;</p>
<p>* &#8220;One in every 100 U.S. adults 16 and older is in prison or jail in America (about 2.3 million in 2006). About 43 percent do not have a high school diploma or equivalent, and 56 percent have very low literacy skills. Ninety-five percent of incarcerated people return to our communities. It is hard enough for them to find jobs burdened with a prison record, but it is nearly impossible without the necessary education and basic skills.&#8221;</p>
<p>* &#8220;About 2 million immigrants come to the U.S. each year seeking jobs and better lives—the promise of America. About 50 percent of them have low literacy levels and lack high school education and English language skills, severely limiting their access to jobs and job training, college, and citizenship.&#8221;</p>
<p>The National Commission on Adult Literacy is an independent panel of leaders from labor, business, government, education, literacy and philanthropy.</p>
<p>Information about the Commission&#8217;s 9 Recommended Actions and other details of their report can be found on their website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/07/17/future-education-america/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Which American colleges have the best sports programs?</title>
		<link>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/07/10/college-sports-rankings/</link>
		<comments>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/07/10/college-sports-rankings/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 13:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoareamericans.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The results of the 2007-2008 U.S. Sports Academy Director&#8217;s Cup all-sports standings have just been released, with Stanford being the overall winner in the division containing large colleges (Division I).  UCLA and Michigan ranked #2 and #3. The scoring system includes sports for women and men, and is compiled by the National Association of Collegiate [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The results of the 2007-2008 U.S. Sports Academy Director&#8217;s Cup all-sports standings have just been released, with <strong>Stanford being the overall winner</strong> in the division containing large colleges (Division I).  UCLA and Michigan ranked #2 and #3. The scoring system includes sports for women and men, and is compiled by the National Association of Collegiate Directors of Athletics, The United States Sports Academy and USA Today.</p>
<p>Men&#8217;s sports included basketball, baseball, cross country, football, golf, gymnastics, hockey, lacrosse, soccer, swimming, tennis, indoor track, outdoor track, volleyball, water polo and wrestling.</p>
<p>Women&#8217;s sports included basketball, bowling, cross country, field hockey, golf, gymnastics, ice hockey, lacrosse, rowing, soccer, softball, swimming, tennis, indoor track, outdoor track, volleyball and water polo&#8230; see the actual rankings of colleges below &#8230;<span id="more-380"></span></p>
<p>Coed fencing, rifle, and skiing replaced a lower score in a few instances.</p>
<p><strong>The Top 10 Colleges were:</strong><br />
1. <strong>Stanford</strong>- 90+ points for mens golf, mens gymnastics, womens basketball, womens cross country, womens volleyball.<br />
2. <strong>UCLA</strong>- 90+ points for mens golf, womens golf, womens tennis, womens water polo.<br />
3. <strong>Michigan</strong> - no 90+ ratings.<br />
4. <strong>Arizona State</strong>- 90+ points for mens indoor track, womens softball, womens indoor track, womens outdoor track.<br />
5. <strong>University of Texas</strong>- 90+ points for mens swimming, mens tennis.<br />
6. <strong>Florida</strong> - no 90+ ratings.<br />
7. <strong>California</strong>- 90+ points for mens water polo, womens tennis.<br />
8. <strong>Louisiana State</strong>- 90+ points for mens football, womens indoor track, womens outdoor track.<br />
9. <strong>Penn State</strong>- 90+ points for mens volleyball, womens field hockey, womens volleyball.<br />
10. <strong>Georgia</strong>- 90+ points for mens baseball, mens tennis, womens gymnastics.</p>
<p><strong>The colleges ranked just below the top 10 are:<br />
</strong>11. Ohio State<br />
12. Texas A&amp;M<br />
13. USC (Univ. of Southern California)<br />
14. North Carolina<br />
15. Florida State<br />
16. Tennessee<br />
17. Virginia<br />
18. Wisconsin<br />
19. Duke<br />
20. Auburn</p>
<p><strong>Winners among smaller colleges include:</strong><br />
Division 2 - Grand Valley State (Michigan)<br />
Division 3 - Williams (Massachusetts)<br />
NAIA - Azusa Pacific (California)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/07/10/college-sports-rankings/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>American generosity - look at the people, not the government</title>
		<link>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/06/12/american-foreign-aid-2/</link>
		<comments>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/06/12/american-foreign-aid-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[Featured]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoareamericans.com/?p=351</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[American people are very generous. But you still hear comments of how America rates low in its commitment to foreign aid. What&#8217;s the real story?
If you look only at the U.S. Government, &#8230; the U.S. Government comes in near last among developed nations in terms of foreign aid as a percentage of gross national income &#8230; but if you look [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>American people are very generous. But you still hear comments of how America rates low in its commitment to foreign aid. What&#8217;s the real story?</p>
<p>If you look only at the U.S. Government, &#8230; the U.S. Government comes in near last among developed nations in terms of foreign aid as a percentage of gross national income &#8230; but if you look at American individuals and families and non-governmental organizations, you would see &#8230; American people are some of the most generous people in the world.</p>
<p><strong>*</strong>Americans (outside government channels)<strong> give a higher percentage of their income for aid to underdeveloped countries than citizens in any developed country in the world.</strong></p>
<p><strong>*The U.S.A. (government and non-government combined) leads the world in total financial flow to developing countries- 192-billion</strong> (USD) in investments, philanthropy and remittances &#8230; <strong><span style="color: #ff6600;">and 88% of America&#8217;s foreign aid to developing countries comes from non-governmental sources</span>.<span id="more-351"></span></strong></p>
<p><strong>*</strong> The USA is <strong>6th in the world in terms of foreign aid spent per person if you take into account all private and public sources of financial support</strong>.</p>
<p>The statistics above are according to the <a title="Center for Global Prosperity" rel="nofollow" href="http://gpr.hudson.org">Hudson Institute&#8217;s Center for Global Prosperity</a> in their annual report analyzing 2006 data.</p>
<p><strong>America&#8217;s $192-billion amounts to about 45% of the entire OECD</strong>&#8217;s (30 countries forming the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) <strong>contributions</strong> (public and private) to developing countries.</p>
<p>Those that complain the U.S. Government does not provide enough foreign assistance, must also realize the tremendous generosity of American individuals, churches, foundations, nonprofits, colleges and other organizations.</p>
<p><strong><span style="color: #ff9900;">The model of philanthropy worldwide has changed</span></strong>. The study shows about <strong>88% of America&#8217;s aid to developing countries comes from individuals and organizations not affiliated with the U.S. Government.</strong> And it&#8217;s happening in the U.K. and many other countries.</p>
<p><strong>Government aid worldwide is now a minority participant in the growth and development of poor nations</strong> &#8230; accounting for less than 25% of the financial aid. <span style="color: #ff9900;"><strong>Worldwide, in 2006, private financial flows of money accounted for over 75 percent of donor countries&#8217; entire economic dealings with developing countries</strong>.</span> In 1990, worldwide government aid to developing countries was larger than private aid. Why such a rapid change? That would be an interesting study. I&#8217;m sure many would argue that private efforts are administered more effectively than government efforts.</p>
<p>Sweden, Luxembourg and Norway follow the old model and give about 80% of their assistance through government aid. <strong>In terms of total USD value of Government Official Development Assistance, the U.S. Government leads the world with 23.53 billion USD</strong>. Rounding out the Top 5 are the U.K. with $12.46 billion, Japan with 11.19 billion, France with 10.60 billion, Germany with 10.44 billion.</p>
<p><strong>In terms of a percentage of Gross National Income, the U.S. Government comes in 21st</strong> (0.18%) of the OECD countries, with the governments of Sweden, Luxembourg, Norway, Netherlands and Denmark leading the list &#8230; providing 0.80% or more of GNI in ODA assistance.</p>
<p><strong>But any measure of a country&#8217;s commitment to foreign aid must look at both government and non-government sources of foreign aid.</strong> This measure of both government and non-government financial flows to developing countries may provide the most useful <strong>&#8216;generosity index</strong>&#8216; &#8230; the results below:</p>
<p>% of Gross National income sent to developing countries (combining goverment and non-government sources):</p>
<p>Sweden - 1.28% <br />
Luxembourg - 1.09%<br />
Norway - 1.08%<br />
Netherlands - 1.05%<br />
Denmark - 0.99%<br />
United States - 0.99%<br />
Canada - 0.91%<br />
Spain - 0.88%<br />
Australia - 0.85%<br />
United Kingdom - 0.84%<br />
Ireland - 0.84%<br />
Austria - 0.83%<br />
Switzerland - 0.77%<br />
France - 0.76%<br />
New Zealand - 0.67%<br />
Belgium - 0.66%<br />
Germany - 0.66%<br />
Greece - 0.48%<br />
Finland - 0.44%<br />
Italy - 0.40%<br />
Portugal - 0.36%<br />
Japan - 0.34%</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/06/12/american-foreign-aid-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Growing number of Asians playing baseball in America</title>
		<link>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/06/07/asian-baseball-players/</link>
		<comments>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/06/07/asian-baseball-players/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:39:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoareamericans.com/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One more indication of the internationalization of sports in America is the increasing number of professional Asian baseball players now playing in the U.S. Major leagues. A recent article by Forbes magazine lists 24 current Asian baseball players in America. 17 from Japan. 3 from Korea. 4 from Taiwan.
American professional soccer, hockey, basketball and baseball [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more indication of the internationalization of sports in America is the increasing number of professional Asian baseball players now playing in the U.S. Major leagues. A recent article by Forbes magazine lists 24 current Asian baseball players in America. 17 from Japan. 3 from Korea. 4 from Taiwan.</p>
<p>American professional soccer, hockey, basketball and baseball leagues have a large number of foreign players. American football does not yet have many foreign born players. The list of professional Asian baseball players in America:<span id="more-353"></span></p>
<p><strong>12 Pitchers:<br />
</strong>Daisuke Matsuzaka - Boston Red Sox<br />
Hideki Okajima - Boston Red Sox<br />
Hiroki Kuroda - Los Angeles Dodgers<br />
Takashi Saito - Los Angeles Dodgers<br />
Masahide Kobayashi - Cleveland Indians<br />
Kazuo Fukumori - Texas Rangers<br />
Yasuhiko Yabuta - Kansas City Royals<br />
Kei Igawa - New York Yankees<br />
Cha Seung Baek - Seattle Mariners<br />
Jae Kuk Ryu - Tampa Bay Rays<br />
Hong-Chih Kuo - Los Angeles Dodgers<br />
Chien-Ming Wang - New York Yankees</p>
<p><strong>1 Catcher:<br />
</strong>Kenji Johjima - Seattle Mariners</p>
<p><strong>6 Outfielders:</strong><br />
Kosuke Fukudome - Chicago Cubs<br />
Dave Roberts - San Francisco Giants<br />
Ichiro Suzuki - Seattle Mariners<br />
So Taguchi - Philadelphia Phillies<br />
Hideki Matsui - New York Yankees<br />
Shin-Soo Choo - Cleveland Indians</p>
<p><strong>5 Infielders:<br />
</strong>Tadahito Iguchi - San Diego Padres<br />
Akinori Iwamura - Tampa Bay Rays<br />
Kazuo Matsui - Houston Astros<br />
Chin-lung Hu - Los Angeles Dodgers<br />
Yung Chi Chen - Seattle Mariners</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/06/07/asian-baseball-players/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>USC makes historic religious appointment</title>
		<link>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/06/06/usc-religious-dean/</link>
		<comments>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/06/06/usc-religious-dean/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jun 2008 14:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://whoareamericans.com/?p=354</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The University of Southern California (USC) has become the first major American university to appoint a member of the Hindu faith to their top religious position as Dean of Religious Life. Dean Varun Soni will take over the position on July 1, 2008.
He will replace the retiring USC pioneer, current Dean of Religious Life Rabbi [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The University of Southern California (USC) has become the <strong>first major American university to appoint a member of the Hindu faith to their top religious position</strong> as Dean of Religious Life. <strong>Dean Varun Soni</strong> will take over the position on July 1, 2008.</p>
<p>He will replace the retiring USC pioneer, current Dean of Religious Life Rabbi Susan Laemmle, who was the first non-Christian to lead a major university in religious life.<span id="more-354"></span></p>
<p>Dean Soni holds a bachelor&#8217;s degree in religion from Tufts University, a master&#8217;s degree in Theological Studies from Harvard University, a master&#8217;s degree in comparative religion from UCSB, and a juris doctor degree from UCLA. A native of India, he was raised in Southern California.</p>
<p>USC has the largest enrollment of international students at an American university, with over 7,000 scholars from more than 100 countries. USC has 70 student religious groups and 35 Religious Directors on campus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://whoareamericans.com/2008/06/06/usc-religious-dean/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
